Home / Services
SERVICES

Offensive security services.

Manual, exploit-driven engagements run by operators who compromise systems for a living. Five services that map your real exposure, prove what is exploitable, and verify every fix.

What we do

Built to find what scanners miss.

How we work

One disciplined process, every engagement.

From first finding to verified fix - the five-step path every assessment follows. Hover a star to expand the step.

Step 01

Discover

Identify weaknesses across your in-scope estate, combining tooling with manual inspection to surface what automated scans miss.

Step 02

Validate

Confirm exploitability by reproducing each issue by hand and proving it with a working attack path, so nothing ships as a false positive.

Step 03

Prioritize

Assess business impact by ranking findings on real-world exploitability and the sensitivity of what sits behind them, not raw severity alone.

Step 04

Remediate

Fix before exploitation with concrete, engineer-ready guidance, and support your team directly through the changes where it helps.

Step 05

Verify

Retest and secure by re-attacking remediated findings to confirm they are genuinely closed and no new exposure was introduced.

01Discover02Validate03Prioritize04Remediate05Verify
01

Discover

Identify weaknesses across your in-scope estate, combining tooling with manual inspection to surface what automated scans miss.

02

Validate

Confirm exploitability by reproducing each issue by hand and proving it with a working attack path, so nothing ships as a false positive.

03

Prioritize

Assess business impact by ranking findings on real-world exploitability and the sensitivity of what sits behind them, not raw severity alone.

04

Remediate

Fix before exploitation with concrete, engineer-ready guidance, and support your team directly through the changes where it helps.

05

Verify

Retest and secure by re-attacking remediated findings to confirm they are genuinely closed and no new exposure was introduced.

Methodology

Grounded in the standards that set the bar.

We build on established frameworks and treat them as a coverage floor, not a checklist.

OWASP

The open standard for application and API security testing.

We test web and API targets against the OWASP Testing Guide and the Top 10 risk categories, treating them as a coverage floor rather than a checklist. The OWASP Application Security Verification Standard gives our reports a shared, measurable baseline that maps cleanly to your developers' frame of reference. For APIs, we work to the OWASP API Security Top 10, which captures the authorization and exposure risks unique to that surface.

  • Coverage aligned to the OWASP Web and API Security Top 10
  • Verification depth structured around ASVS levels
  • Methodology drawn from the OWASP Testing Guide
  • Findings mapped to language your engineers already use

MITRE ATT&CK

The shared taxonomy of real-world adversary tactics and techniques.

Every red-team action and hunting hypothesis is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, so results are expressed in the same language your detection engineering and threat intelligence teams already use. We emulate the specific techniques associated with the threat groups relevant to your sector, then measure your detection coverage technique by technique. The matrix becomes a scorecard: a precise map of which adversary behaviors you can see and which you cannot.

  • Operations mapped technique-by-technique to the ATT&CK matrix
  • Threat-group emulation based on documented adversary behavior
  • Detection coverage measured against specific techniques
  • Purple-team tuning driven by ATT&CK gaps

NIST

Federal guidance for risk-based security testing and assessment.

We align technical testing with NIST SP 800-115, the standard methodology for security testing and assessment, and frame results against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework so leadership can read them in risk terms. This makes our findings straightforward to slot into existing governance, audit, and risk-management processes. Where relevant, we reference the SP 800-53 control families that a finding implicates.

  • Technical methodology grounded in NIST SP 800-115
  • Results framed against the Cybersecurity Framework functions
  • Findings tied to relevant SP 800-53 control families
  • Output structured for existing governance and audit processes

PTES

The end-to-end standard for how a penetration test is run.

The Penetration Testing Execution Standard defines the lifecycle our engagements follow, from pre-engagement scoping through intelligence gathering, threat modeling, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting. Following PTES keeps engagements consistent and rigorous regardless of who runs them, and ensures the unglamorous phases - scoping and post-exploitation analysis - get the same discipline as exploitation. It is the connective tissue between the technique-level frameworks and a coherent engagement.

  • Consistent engagement lifecycle from scoping to reporting
  • Structured intelligence gathering and threat modeling
  • Disciplined post-exploitation and impact analysis
  • Repeatable rigor independent of the individual tester
Get ahead of zero

Ready to see yourself the way an adversary would?

Book a scoped assessment - we will map what is reachable, prove what is exploitable, and give you a ranked path to closing it before someone finds it first.

Book a free scoping call